CHALLENGES IN ENFORCING HATE SPEECH LAWS IN INDONESIAN POLITICS
Keywords:Enforcing hate speech laws, Indonesian politics, challenges, legal framework, biases, capacity building, digital platforms
Enforcing hate speech laws in Indonesian politics has posed significant challenges in the past. These challenges have impeded the effective implementation of legal measures designed to address hate speech and ensure a fair and inclusive political environment. One of the key challenges was the need for a clear and comprehensive legal framework. Historically, hate speech laws in Indonesia were criticized for being vague and open to interpretation, leading to inconsistent application and potential bias in enforcement. The absence of specific guidelines and criteria for identifying hate speech hindered the prosecution process. Political pressures and biases also posed significant obstacles to enforcing hate speech laws. The influence of political affiliations and interests often interfered with objective decision-making, leading to selective enforcement or leniency based on political considerations. This compromised the impartiality and independence of the enforcement process. Moreover, limited capacity and training among law enforcement agencies and judicial institutions created further hurdles. There needs to be more understanding of hate speech issues, lack of expertise in investigating and prosecuting such cases, and inadequate resources hampering the effective implementation of hate speech laws. These challenges in enforcing hate speech laws in Indonesian politics have hindered the protection of fundamental rights, fostered polarization, and undermined the inclusive nature of the political discourse. Addressing these challenges requires comprehensive legal reforms, capacity building for law enforcement and judicial institutions, and strategies that effectively tackle hate speech in the digital realm.
Angell, C., Alexander, J., & Hunt, J. A. (2015). ‘Draw, write and tell’: A literature review and methodological development on the ‘draw and write research method. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 13(1), 17-28.
Anggraheni, P., Setyowati, N. T., & Harry, H. (2021). Social Media and Political Participation in Indonesia: Restrictions Access at Announcement Results of 2019 Presidential Election. Aspiration Journal, 2(1), 99-128.
Ben-Porath, S. R. (2023). Cancel wars: How universities can foster free speech, promote inclusion, and renew democracy—University of Chicago Press.
Brown, A., & Sinclair, A. (2019). The politics of hate speech laws. Routledge.
Bunde, E. (2021). AI-Assisted and explainable hate speech detection for social media moderators–A design science approach.
Bychawska-Siniarska, D. (2017). Protecting the right to freedom of expression under the European Convention on Human rights: A handbook for legal practitioners. Council of Europe.
Calin, D., & Zaharia, L. (2021). Recent Controversy Regarding the Promotion of Judges in Romania: Searching for Meritocracy. In IJCA (Vol. 12, p. 1).
Calvo-Villamañán, A., San Millán, Á., & Carrilero, L. (2023). Tackling AMR from a multidisciplinary perspective: a primer from education and psychology. International Microbiology, 26(1), 1-9.
Coenen, D. T. (2018). Free Speech and the Law of Evidence. Duke LJ, 68, 639.
Doncel-Martín, I., Catalan-Matamoros, D., & Elías, C. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and public diplomacy as formulas to reduce hate speech on social media in the fake news era. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 28(2), 340-352.
Faris, R., Ashar, A., Gasser, U., & Joo, D. (2016). Understanding harmful speech online. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication, (2016-21).
Ferrell, O. C., & Fraedrich, J. (2021). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases. Cengage learning.
Gagliardone, I., Gal, D., Alves, T., & Martinez, G. (2015). Countering online hate speech. Unesco Publishing.
Gardbaum, S. (2020). The counter-playbook: Resisting the populist assault on the Separation of Powers. Colum. J. Transnat'l L., 59, 1.
Gill, P., Clemmow, C., Hetzel, F., Rottweiler, B., Salman, N., Van Der Vegt, I., ... & Corner, E. (2021). A systematic review of mental health problems and violent extremism. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 32(1), 51-78.
Gillis, B. (2012). Understanding hate crime statutes and building towards a better system in Texas. Am. J. Crim. L., 40, 197.
Helm, R. K., & Nasu, H. (2021). Regulatory responses to ‘fake news’ and freedom of expression: normative and empirical evaluation. Human Rights Law Review, 21(2), 302-328.
Hermanto, B. (2023). Deliberate legislative reforms to improve the legislation quality in developing countries: the case of Indonesia. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 11(1), 1–31.
Jaelani, A. K., & Luthviati, R. D. (2021). The Crime Of Damage After the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 76/PUU-XV/2017. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1(1).
Jiao, Y., Yeophantong, P., & Lee, T. M. (2021). Strengthening international legal cooperation to combat the illegal wildlife trade between Southeast Asia and China. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, p. 9, 645427.
Kalu, A. O. U., Unachukwu, L. C., & Ibiam, O. (2019). Accessing secondary data: A literature review.
Kennedy, B., Atari, M., Davani, A. M., Yeh, L., Omrani, A., Kim, Y., ... & Dehghani, M. (2018). The Gab hate corpus: A collection of 27k posts annotated for hate speech. PsyArXiv. July 18.
La Rooy, D., Brubacher, S. P., Aromäki-Stratos, A., Cyr, M., Hershkowitz, I., Korkman, J., ... & Lamb, M. E. (2015). The NICHD protocol: A review of an internationally-used evidence-based tool for training child forensic interviewers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy, and Practice, 1(2), 76-89.
Mason, G., Maher, J., McCulloch, J., Pickering, S., Wickes, R., & McKay, C. (2017). Policing hate crime: Understanding communities and prejudice. Taylor & Francis.
Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Farkas, J. (2021). Racism, hate speech, and social media: A systematic review and critique. Television & New Media, 22(2), 205-224.
Mathias, J. (2021). Hate speech and its threat to law enforcement. The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 3(1), 15–26.
McCoy, J., & Somer, M. (2019). Toward a theory of pernicious polarization and how it harms democracies: Comparative evidence and possible remedies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 234–271.
Menzel, D. C. (2012). Ethics management for public administrators: Leading and building organizations of integrity. ME Sharpe.
Nurdin, N., Stockdale, R., & Scheepers, H. (2014). Coordination and cooperation in e‐government: An Indonesian local e‐government case. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 61(1), 1–21.
Obama, B. (2016). The president's role in advancing criminal justice reform. Harv. L. Rev., pp. 130, 811.
Ochs, S. (2023). A Framework for Synergy: Synthesizing the Relationship Between the International Criminal Court and Hybrid Tribunals. Berkeley Journal of International Law (BJIL), Forthcoming.
Omelchuk, O. M., Haiur, I. Y., Kozytska, O. G., Prysiazhna, A. V., & Khmelevska, N. V. (2022). Analysis of the activities of law enforcement authorities in the field of combating crime and corruption offenses. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 25(3), 700-716.
Pal, M. (2016). Electoral management bodies as a fourth branch of government. Rev. Const. Stud., pp. 21, 85.
Perbawani, P. S., Rahayu, R., & Anshari, I. N. (2018). Online political participation and Netizen Anonymity in Indonesia's digital democracy. PCD Journal, 6(2), 185-212.
Price, P., Kobau, R., Buelow, J., Austin, J., & Lowenberg, K. (2015). Improving understanding, promoting social inclusion, and fostering empowerment related to epilepsy: Epilepsy Foundation public awareness campaigns—2001 through 2013. Epilepsy & Behavior, 44, 239-244.
Regus, M. (2020). Interreligious conflicts in post-authoritarian Indonesia: Assumptions, causes, and implications. Jurnal Politik, 5(2), 2.
Roach, K. (2014). Models of civilian police review: The objectives and mechanisms of legal and political regulation of the police. Crim. L.Q., pp. 61, 29.
Setijadi, C. (2021). The pandemic as a political opportunity: Jokowi's Indonesia in Covid-19. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 57(3), 297–320.
Sharma, D. (2022). Independence of Judiciary in India and U.S.: A Comparative Analysis. IUP Law Review, 12(4).
Strossen, N. (2018). Hate: Why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship. Oxford University Press.
Tabish, S. Z. S., & Jha, K. N. (2012). The impact of anti-corruption strategies on corruption-free performance in public construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 30(1), 21–35.
Tangen, J. M., Kent, K. M., & Searston, R. A. (2020). Collective intelligence in fingerprint analysis. Cognitive research: principles and implications, pp. 5, 1–7.
Thomas, J., Utley, J., Hong, S. Y., Korkmaz, H., & Nugent, G. (2020). A Review of the Research. Handbook of Research on STEM Education.
Thomas, S. (2016). Future Ready Learning: Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education. 2016 National Education Technology Plan. Office of Educational Technology, U.S. Department of Education.
Todorovic, B., & Trifunovic, D. (2020). Prevention of (Ab-) Internet Use for Terrorist Plotting and Related Purposes. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT).
Towl, G. J., & Walker, T. (2019). Tackling sexual violence at universities: An international perspective. Routledge.
Tsesis, A. (2016). Balancing Free Speech. BUL Rev., pp. 96, 1.
Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2018). Disturbance features, coordination, and cooperation: an institutional economics analysis of adaptations in the Spanish irrigation sector. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(3), 501-526.
Waisbord, S. (2020). Mob censorship: Online harassment of U.S. journalists in times of digital hate and populism. Digital Journalism, 8(8), 1030–1046.
Whelan, M., & Genoe, R. (2022). Law Enforcement Agency Capacity Building as a Driver for the Adoption of European Research. European Law Enforcement Research Bulletin, (22).
Wilson, R. A., & Land, M. K. (2020). Hate speech on social media: Content moderation in context. Conn. L. Rev., pp. 52, 1029.
Wirtz, B. W., & Birkmeyer, S. (2015). Open government: Origin, development, and conceptual perspectives. International Journal of public administration, 38(5), 381-396.
Yana, E., Amboro, F. Y. P., Nurisman, E., & Hadiyati, N. (2021). The Role Of The Polri In The Law Enforcement Of The Distribution Of Hate Speech In The City Of Batam, Indonesia. Ganesha Law Review, 3(1), 43-55.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND BUSINESS (INJOSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.